1960 Ford Taunus vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Ford Taunus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1960 Ford Taunus. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1960 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Ford Taunus weights approximately 226 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Ford Taunus (111 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1960 Ford Taunus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Ford Taunus | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Ford | MCC |
| Model | Taunus | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 111 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 1810 mm |
