1960 Ford Taunus vs. 2004 Mazda MX
To start off, 2004 Mazda MX is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda MX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1960 Ford Taunus. (70 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX should accelerate faster than 1960 Ford Taunus.
Because 1960 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda MX (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Ford Taunus. (140 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2004 Mazda MX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Ford Taunus.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ford Taunus | 2004 Mazda MX | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Taunus | MX |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1758 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 94 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2760 mm |