1960 Ford Taunus vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2008 Mazda Rustler is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,758 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Ford Taunus is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Ford Taunus weights approximately 46 kg more than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Because 1960 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Rustler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Ford Taunus (140 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (102 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1960 Ford Taunus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ford Taunus | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Taunus | Rustler |
Year Released | 1960 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 1758 cc | 1323 cc |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 83.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 996 kg | 950 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2570 mm |