1960 Ford Zodiac vs. 1956 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1960 Ford Zodiac is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Jeep CJ5 (135 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1960 Ford Zodiac. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1956 Jeep CJ5 should accelerate faster than 1960 Ford Zodiac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 11 kg more than 1956 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1956 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Ford Zodiac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Jeep CJ5 (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Ford Zodiac. (187 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1956 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ford Zodiac | 1956 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Zodiac | CJ5 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 187 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2060 mm |