1960 Ford Zodiac vs. 1978 Mazda 626

To start off, 1978 Mazda 626 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda 626 (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1960 Ford Zodiac. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1960 Ford Zodiac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 196 kg more than 1978 Mazda 626.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Ford Zodiac (187 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 626. (150 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1960 Ford Zodiac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 626.

Compare all specifications:

1960 Ford Zodiac 1978 Mazda 626
Make Ford Mazda
Model Zodiac 626
Year Released 1960 1978
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2552 cc 1768 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 76 HP 93 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 187 Nm 150 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3300 RPM
Engine Bore Size 82.6 mm 80 mm
Engine Stroke Size 79.5 mm 88 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1191 kg 995 kg
Vehicle Length 4600 mm 4310 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1520 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2520 mm