1960 Ford Zodiac vs. 1978 Toyota Tercel
To start off, 1978 Toyota Tercel is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 371 kg more than 1978 Toyota Tercel.
Because 1960 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Toyota Tercel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ford Zodiac | 1978 Toyota Tercel | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Zodiac | Tercel |
Year Released | 1960 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2510 mm |