1960 Ford Zodiac vs. 1982 Jeep CJ7
To start off, 1982 Jeep CJ7 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Ford Zodiac (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 114 kg more than 1960 Ford Zodiac.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Ford Zodiac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Ford Zodiac (187 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (128 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1960 Ford Zodiac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ford Zodiac | 1982 Jeep CJ7 | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Zodiac | CJ7 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 187 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 1305 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2380 mm |