1960 Ford Zodiac vs. 1990 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1990 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 87 kg more than 1990 Toyota Lite Ace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ford Zodiac | 1990 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Zodiac | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 1960 | 1990 |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1910 mm |