1960 Ford Zodiac vs. 1993 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 1993 Mahindra Armada is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Ford Zodiac (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1993 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 1993 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 809 kg more than 1960 Ford Zodiac.
Because 1993 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Ford Zodiac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ford Zodiac | 1993 Mahindra Armada | |
Make | Ford | Mahindra |
Model | Zodiac | Armada |
Year Released | 1960 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 2298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4310 mm |