1960 Ford Zodiac vs. 1996 Fiat Siena
To start off, 1996 Fiat Siena is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Ford Zodiac (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Fiat Siena weights approximately 109 kg more than 1960 Ford Zodiac.
Because 1960 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Fiat Siena (200 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Ford Zodiac. (187 Nm). This means 1996 Fiat Siena will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Ford Zodiac | 1996 Fiat Siena | |
| Make | Ford | Fiat |
| Model | Zodiac | Siena |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2552 cc | 1910 cc |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 187 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 1300 kg |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 65 L |
