1960 Ford Zodiac vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 1996 Holden XU 6 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Zodiac would be higher.
Because 1960 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 328 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Ford Zodiac. (187 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ford Zodiac | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Zodiac | XU 6 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 187 Nm | 515 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |