1960 Ford Zodiac vs. 2000 GMC Safari
To start off, 2000 GMC Safari is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Safari (190 HP) has 114 more horse power than 1960 Ford Zodiac. (76 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 1960 Ford Zodiac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Safari weights approximately 765 kg more than 1960 Ford Zodiac. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Safari (319 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Ford Zodiac. (187 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ford Zodiac | 2000 GMC Safari | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | Zodiac | Safari |
Year Released | 1960 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 187 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 1956 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2830 mm |