1960 Ford Zodiac vs. 2003 Jeep Liberty
To start off, 2003 Jeep Liberty is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Liberty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Liberty (210 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1960 Ford Zodiac. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Liberty should accelerate faster than 1960 Ford Zodiac.
Because 2003 Jeep Liberty is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Ford Zodiac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Liberty will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Liberty (320 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Ford Zodiac. (187 Nm). This means 2003 Jeep Liberty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Ford Zodiac.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ford Zodiac | 2003 Jeep Liberty | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Zodiac | Liberty |
Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 187 Nm | 320 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 91 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2660 mm |