1960 Ford Zodiac vs. 2010 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC60 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 730 kg more than 1960 Ford Zodiac.
Because 2010 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Ford Zodiac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Ford Zodiac | 2010 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Zodiac | XC60 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2552 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1191 kg | 1921 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2748 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 70 L |