1960 Ford Zodiac vs. 2011 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2011 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Pathfinder (187 HP) has 111 more horse power than 1960 Ford Zodiac. (76 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1960 Ford Zodiac.
Because 2011 Nissan Pathfinder is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Ford Zodiac. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Pathfinder will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Ford Zodiac | 2011 Nissan Pathfinder | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Zodiac | Pathfinder |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2552 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 76 HP | 187 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4884 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1849 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1834 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2850 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 80 L |
