1960 Holden FB Special vs. 1996 Rover 400
To start off, 1996 Rover 400 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Holden FB Special. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Holden FB Special would be higher. At 2,261 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Holden FB Special is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 400 (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1960 Holden FB Special. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 400 should accelerate faster than 1960 Holden FB Special.
Because 1960 Holden FB Special is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Holden FB Special. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Holden FB Special (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1960 Holden FB Special will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Holden FB Special | 1996 Rover 400 | |
Make | Holden | Rover |
Model | FB Special | 400 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2560 mm |