1960 Holden FC vs. 1974 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1974 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Holden FC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Holden FC would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Holden FC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1960 Holden FC. (62 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 1960 Holden FC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Holden FC weights approximately 130 kg more than 1974 Mazda RX-3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Holden FC (150 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1960 Holden FC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Holden FC | 1974 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | FC | RX-3 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1962 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2320 mm |