1960 Holden FC vs. 1978 Volvo 164
To start off, 1978 Volvo 164 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Holden FC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Holden FC would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Volvo 164 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1960 Holden FC. (62 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 1960 Holden FC.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Volvo 164 (204 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Holden FC. (150 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1978 Volvo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Holden FC.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Holden FC | 1978 Volvo 164 | |
| Make | Holden | Volvo |
| Model | FC | 164 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 2998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 204 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3350 mm |
