1960 Holden FC vs. 1980 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1980 Toyota Celica is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Holden FC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Holden FC would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1980 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Toyota Celica (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1960 Holden FC. (62 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1960 Holden FC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Toyota Celica weights approximately 202 kg more than 1960 Holden FC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Holden FC. (150 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1980 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Holden FC.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Holden FC | 1980 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | FC | Celica |
Year Released | 1960 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1182 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2640 mm |