1960 Holden FC vs. 1984 Opel Kadett
To start off, 1984 Opel Kadett is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Holden FC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Holden FC would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Holden FC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Holden FC (62 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1984 Opel Kadett. (53 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Holden FC should accelerate faster than 1984 Opel Kadett.
Because 1960 Holden FC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Holden FC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Opel Kadett, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Holden FC (150 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Opel Kadett. (98 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1960 Holden FC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Opel Kadett.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Holden FC | 1984 Opel Kadett | |
Make | Holden | Opel |
Model | FC | Kadett |
Year Released | 1960 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 98 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2530 mm |