1960 Holden FC vs. 1990 Isuzu Stylus
To start off, 1990 Isuzu Stylus is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Holden FC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Holden FC would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Holden FC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Isuzu Stylus (125 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1960 Holden FC. (62 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Isuzu Stylus should accelerate faster than 1960 Holden FC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Isuzu Stylus weights approximately 94 kg more than 1960 Holden FC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Holden FC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Holden FC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Isuzu Stylus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Holden FC | 1990 Isuzu Stylus | |
| Make | Holden | Isuzu |
| Model | FC | Stylus |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 125 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1074 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4200 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2460 mm |
