1960 Holden FC vs. 1998 Rover Mini
To start off, 1998 Rover Mini is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Holden FC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Holden FC would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Holden FC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 62 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Holden FC weights approximately 284 kg more than 1998 Rover Mini.
Because 1960 Holden FC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Holden FC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover Mini, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Holden FC (150 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover Mini. (94 Nm). This means 1960 Holden FC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover Mini.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Holden FC | 1998 Rover Mini | |
Make | Holden | Rover |
Model | FC | Mini |
Year Released | 1960 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 94 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 696 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2750 mm |