1960 Holden FC vs. 1999 Mitsubishi GTO
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Holden FC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Holden FC would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO (276 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 1960 Holden FC. (62 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO should accelerate faster than 1960 Holden FC.
Because 1999 Mitsubishi GTO is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Holden FC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mitsubishi GTO (426 Nm) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Holden FC. (150 Nm). This means 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Holden FC. 1999 Mitsubishi GTO has automatic transmission and 1960 Holden FC has manual transmission. 1960 Holden FC will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mitsubishi GTO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Holden FC | 1999 Mitsubishi GTO | |
| Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
| Model | FC | GTO |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 2972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 426 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2730 mm |
