1960 Holden FC vs. 2002 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJ is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Holden FC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Holden FC would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 1960 Holden FC. (62 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1960 Holden FC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 820 kg more than 1960 Holden FC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 391 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Holden FC. (150 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Holden FC. 2002 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1960 Holden FC has manual transmission. 1960 Holden FC will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: