1960 Holden FC vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Holden FC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Holden FC would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Holden FC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (118 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1960 Holden FC. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1960 Holden FC.
Because 1960 Holden FC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Holden FC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Megane (280 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Holden FC. (150 Nm). This means 2003 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Holden FC.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Holden FC | 2003 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Holden | Renault |
| Model | FC | Megane |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2680 mm |
