1960 Holden FC vs. 2004 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Holden FC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Holden FC would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1960 Holden FC. (62 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1960 Holden FC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 825 kg more than 1960 Holden FC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Holden FC. (150 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Holden FC.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Holden FC | 2004 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Holden | Jaguar |
Model | FC | XK |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 294 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 411 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2590 mm |