1960 Holden FC vs. 2005 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Holden FC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Holden FC would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (147 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1960 Holden FC. (62 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1960 Holden FC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 854 kg more than 1960 Holden FC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Holden FC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (343 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Holden FC. (150 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 2005 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Holden FC.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Holden FC | 2005 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Holden | Jeep |
Model | FC | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 147 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 343 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1834 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2660 mm |