1960 Holden FC vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Holden FC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Holden FC would be higher. At 2,376 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1960 Holden FC. (62 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1960 Holden FC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 530 kg more than 1960 Holden FC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (213 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Holden FC. (150 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Holden FC.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Holden FC | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
Model | FC | Outlander |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 2376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 213 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2760 mm |