1960 Holden FC vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Holden FC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Holden FC would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Holden FC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Matrix (130 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1960 Holden FC. (62 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1960 Holden FC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 245 kg more than 1960 Holden FC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Holden FC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Holden FC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Matrix (170 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Holden FC. (150 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Holden FC.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Holden FC | 2005 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | FC | Matrix |
Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 170 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1225 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2500 mm |