1960 Holden FC vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Holden FC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Holden FC would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1960 Holden FC. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1960 Holden FC.
Because 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Holden FC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Holden FC. (150 Nm). This means 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Holden FC.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Holden FC | 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Holden | Citroen |
| Model | FC | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
