1960 Holden FC vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Holden FC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Holden FC would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 209 more horse power than 1960 Holden FC. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1960 Holden FC.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 450 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Holden FC. (150 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Holden FC. 2012 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1960 Holden FC has manual transmission. 1960 Holden FC will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Holden FC | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Holden | Jaguar |
Model | FC | XF |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 271 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 600 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2908 mm |