1960 Hudson Metropolitan vs. 1968 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 1968 Isuzu Bellel is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Hudson Metropolitan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Hudson Metropolitan would be higher. At 1,991 cc, 1968 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Isuzu Bellel (81 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1960 Hudson Metropolitan. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Isuzu Bellel should accelerate faster than 1960 Hudson Metropolitan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 477 kg more than 1960 Hudson Metropolitan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Isuzu Bellel (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Hudson Metropolitan. (100 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 1968 Isuzu Bellel will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Hudson Metropolitan.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Hudson Metropolitan | 1968 Isuzu Bellel | |
Make | Hudson | Isuzu |
Model | Metropolitan | Bellel |
Year Released | 1960 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 1991 cc |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 100 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 818 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2540 mm |