1960 Hudson Metropolitan vs. 1992 Acura Vigor
To start off, 1992 Acura Vigor is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Hudson Metropolitan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Hudson Metropolitan would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 1992 Acura Vigor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Acura Vigor (176 HP) has 129 more horse power than 1960 Hudson Metropolitan. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Acura Vigor should accelerate faster than 1960 Hudson Metropolitan.
Because 1960 Hudson Metropolitan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Hudson Metropolitan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Acura Vigor, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Hudson Metropolitan | 1992 Acura Vigor | |
| Make | Hudson | Acura |
| Model | Metropolitan | Vigor |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 176 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
