1960 Hudson Metropolitan vs. 2003 Jeep Liberty
To start off, 2003 Jeep Liberty is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Hudson Metropolitan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Hudson Metropolitan would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Liberty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jeep Liberty (210 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 1960 Hudson Metropolitan. (47 HP @ 4100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Liberty should accelerate faster than 1960 Hudson Metropolitan.
Because 2003 Jeep Liberty is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Hudson Metropolitan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Jeep Liberty will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Liberty (320 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Hudson Metropolitan. (100 Nm). This means 2003 Jeep Liberty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Hudson Metropolitan.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Hudson Metropolitan | 2003 Jeep Liberty | |
Make | Hudson | Jeep |
Model | Metropolitan | Liberty |
Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 100 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2660 mm |