1960 Humber Hawk vs. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 420 kg more than 1960 Humber Hawk.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Humber Hawk | 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Humber | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Hawk | Starfire |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2266 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 73 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 60 L |
