1960 Humber Hawk vs. 1965 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 1965 Volkswagen 1500 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 2,266 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Humber Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Humber Hawk (73 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1965 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Humber Hawk should accelerate faster than 1965 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Humber Hawk weights approximately 540 kg more than 1965 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Humber Hawk | 1965 Volkswagen 1500 | |
Make | Humber | Volkswagen |
Model | Hawk | 1500 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2266 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 40 L |