1960 Humber Hawk vs. 1985 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1985 Jeep CJ is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 2,266 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Humber Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Jeep CJ (85 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1960 Humber Hawk. (73 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ should accelerate faster than 1960 Humber Hawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Humber Hawk weights approximately 104 kg more than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Because 1985 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Humber Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Humber Hawk (163 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Jeep CJ. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1960 Humber Hawk will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Humber Hawk | 1985 Jeep CJ | |
| Make | Humber | Jeep |
| Model | Hawk | CJ |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2266 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 73 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1296 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2380 mm |
