1960 Humber Hawk vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Humber Hawk would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Humber Hawk weights approximately 465 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 1960 Humber Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Humber Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Humber Hawk | 2000 Renault Clio | |
Make | Humber | Renault |
Model | Hawk | Clio |
Year Released | 1960 | 2000 |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 50 L |