1960 Humber Hawk vs. 2010 Citroen C3
To start off, 2010 Citroen C3 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 2,266 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Humber Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Humber Hawk (73 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C3. (72 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Humber Hawk should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Humber Hawk weights approximately 189 kg more than 2010 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Humber Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Humber Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Humber Hawk (163 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Citroen C3. (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1960 Humber Hawk will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Humber Hawk | 2010 Citroen C3 | |
| Make | Humber | Citroen |
| Model | Hawk | C3 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2266 cc | 1360 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 73 HP | 72 HP |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 118 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 73.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 110 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1211 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 45 L |
