1960 Humber Hawk vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 2,266 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Humber Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (148 HP) has 75 more horse power than 1960 Humber Hawk. (73 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1960 Humber Hawk.
Because 2010 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Humber Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Humber Hawk | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Humber | Nissan |
| Model | Hawk | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2266 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 73 HP | 148 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 65 L |
