1960 Humber Hawk vs. 2012 Ford Fusion
To start off, 2012 Ford Fusion is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Ford Fusion is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Fusion weights approximately 287 kg more than 1960 Humber Hawk.
Because 1960 Humber Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Humber Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Fusion, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Ford Fusion has automatic transmission and 1960 Humber Hawk has manual transmission. 1960 Humber Hawk will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Ford Fusion will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Humber Hawk | 2012 Ford Fusion | |
Make | Humber | Ford |
Model | Hawk | Fusion |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2266 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4841 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1834 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1445 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2728 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 66 L |