1960 Humber Super Snipe vs. 1999 Mazda AZ
To start off, 1999 Mazda AZ is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Humber Super Snipe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Humber Super Snipe would be higher. At 2,964 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Humber Super Snipe is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Humber Super Snipe weights approximately 756 kg more than 1999 Mazda AZ.
Because 1960 Humber Super Snipe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Humber Super Snipe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda AZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Mazda AZ has automatic transmission and 1960 Humber Super Snipe has manual transmission. 1960 Humber Super Snipe will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mazda AZ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Humber Super Snipe | 1999 Mazda AZ | |
Make | Humber | Mazda |
Model | Super Snipe | AZ |
Year Released | 1960 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2964 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1506 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2370 mm |