1960 Isuzu Minx vs. 1977 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1977 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1977 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1960 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 1960 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 178 kg more than 1977 Mazda RX-3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Mazda RX-3 (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Isuzu Minx. (113 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1977 Mazda RX-3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Isuzu Minx | 1977 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
Model | Minx | RX-3 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1491 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 113 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 852 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2320 mm |