1960 Isuzu Minx vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,491 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Isuzu Minx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Isuzu Minx (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Isuzu Minx should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 160 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1960 Isuzu Minx (113 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. (90 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1960 Isuzu Minx will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Isuzu Minx | 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Minx | Lancer |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1491 cc | 1244 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 113 Nm | 90 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 870 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2390 mm |
