1960 Isuzu Minx vs. 2003 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 2003 Lancia Zeta is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lancia Zeta (134 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1960 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1960 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Lancia Zeta weights approximately 572 kg more than 1960 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lancia Zeta (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Isuzu Minx. (113 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Isuzu Minx. 2003 Lancia Zeta has automatic transmission and 1960 Isuzu Minx has manual transmission. 1960 Isuzu Minx will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Lancia Zeta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Isuzu Minx | 2003 Lancia Zeta | |
| Make | Isuzu | Lancia |
| Model | Minx | Zeta |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1491 cc | 1910 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 134 HP |
| Torque | 113 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 88 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1602 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2830 mm |
