1960 Isuzu Minx vs. 2005 Lada Niva
To start off, 2005 Lada Niva is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,690 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Lada Niva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lada Niva (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1960 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lada Niva should accelerate faster than 1960 Isuzu Minx.
Because 2005 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Isuzu Minx. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lada Niva (128 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Isuzu Minx. (113 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2005 Lada Niva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Isuzu Minx | 2005 Lada Niva | |
| Make | Isuzu | Lada |
| Model | Minx | Niva |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1491 cc | 1690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 113 Nm | 128 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 80 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2210 mm |
