1960 Isuzu Minx vs. 2010 Acura CSX
To start off, 2010 Acura CSX is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Acura CSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 135 more horse power than 1960 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1960 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Acura CSX weights approximately 283 kg more than 1960 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Isuzu Minx | 2010 Acura CSX | |
Make | Isuzu | Acura |
Model | Minx | CSX |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1491 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2700 mm |