1960 Isuzu Minx vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 77 more horse power than 1960 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1960 Isuzu Minx.
Because 1960 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (176 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Isuzu Minx. (113 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Isuzu Minx | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Isuzu | Holden |
Model | Minx | Cruze |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1491 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 113 Nm | 176 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2685 mm |