1960 Isuzu Minx vs. 2012 Honda Jazz
To start off, 2012 Honda Jazz is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda Jazz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda Jazz (118 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1960 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda Jazz should accelerate faster than 1960 Isuzu Minx.
Because 1960 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda Jazz (145 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Isuzu Minx. (113 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Honda Jazz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Isuzu Minx | 2012 Honda Jazz | |
Make | Isuzu | Honda |
Model | Minx | Jazz |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1491 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 113 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2510 mm |