1960 Isuzu Minx vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,491 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Isuzu Minx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1960 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1960 Isuzu Minx.
Because 1960 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Isuzu Minx (113 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1960 Isuzu Minx will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Isuzu Minx | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Isuzu | Nissan |
Model | Minx | Micra |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1491 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 113 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2449 mm |